The Strap that Changed My Life

Blackrapids RS-7 Side View


I can break all reviews into two categories: those that are solicited, and those that are not. This is the latter. And I write this unsolicited review because I believe Blackrapid’s straps have changed my life in a significantly positive way.

Jonah Kessel with Blackrapid's RS-7

DSLR News Shooter is a great resource for finding out about new gear and user opinions of the most up to date technology. Looking at the past couple weeks there are reviews of new cameras, new sliders, new glass and even a new user medium. As technology (and our gear habits) advance its easy to forget about some of the most basic parts of our kit.

But its ok, Blackrapid has not. The relatively nascent company rethought the most basic element of our kit — the strap.

Here’s how it works:

Blackrapids RS-7 Screw

FasternR System: Each strap uses a small screw which attaches to your cameras tripod mount. Between the screw and the camera is a small rubber washer unit which both protects the camera from getting scratched as well as stops the screw from unintentional loosening. After two years of using the system — the screw has never become loose enough to which it came even close to following off. I’ve climbed mountains, crossed rivers and sat on the side of helicopters with cameras hanging from this screw.

Blackrapids RS-7 on Canon 60D

ConnectR System: On the other side of the camera mount is Blackrapid’s ConnectR System — which is essentially a carabiner that allows the FasternR to swivel. These two items together make an amazing combination because you can have the camera move at your side, without the strap moving — or without needing to adjusted your clothing as you move. The straps then sling either diagonally (RS models) across the chest or vertically down the torso (DR models), distributing weight across the entire body.

Blackrapids RS-7
Blackrapid Diagram

Comfort Level: The strap has done wonders for my physical health, but beyond general comfort Blackrapid has made a strap that is completely adjustable to any body type. On each strap — there are two “stoppers” which can be placed where the user wants the camera to either fall or stop when at desired shooting position. If you place these right, pulling your camera up from your side will be smooth and the camera will stop exactly where you feel comfortable shooting. In addition, Blackrapid make’s male and female models for … varying chest shapes.

Health: For years after work I had neck and back pain from using traditional camera straps that place a heavy weight across the neck. Within weeks of changing straps, I actually felt physically better. I was less soar, my posture improved and I even began to sleep better.

Crowded Street

Mobility: Here I am in sunny India. I often find myself shooting in crowded places. With Blackrapid’s straps, the camera hangs upside down, and you can rest the camera either on your hip or toward the small of your back. Either way, the camera is not sitting right under your face like a bullseye. This is great for a number of reasons. In a crowd like the one above you can sneak through protecting the camera with your body. Second, the straps allow you to hide the camera. In Bihar, India (where the average annual income is $350) you might stick out a bit being foreign and walking around with $10,000 around your neck. When using Blackrapid straps in dodgy places, you can keep the camera out of direct site, making it a little easier to blend in and possibly — a little bit safer.

The system also allows you to use your hands for other stuff, while still keeping the cameras safe. Below, I’m using a Blackrapid DR-1 Double Strap, moving a three meter jib with a Canon 60D on it, with a Canon 7D and Canon 5DMII safely at my sides.

Jonah Kessel with DR-1 Blackrapid's Double Strap

For video oriented DSLR photographers: These things are great. I hate shooting video with a strap attached to the camera. Blackrapid straps come instantly on and off. Since I normally have multiple cameras rolling the straps come in handy all the time when one camera becomes unneeded but I want to have either a lens or a camera on standby.

For still oriented photographers: These things are also great. Above, I’m at a Prada Show shooting a new collection of clothing. While its great to have 10 lenses with you, sometimes space is an issue and being nimble helps. With one Blackrapid DR-1 Double Strap I can shoot all night with two cameras, no bags and no accessories needed to tie around my waste. For fashion, news and wedding photographers two cameras and two lenses is often enough.

MODS: There’s also a ton of add-ons and modifications that work with these things. when shooting stills a Brad which helps stabilize the camera a little.

Normally, I’m not so head over heals, “ready to propose” about a product — but between the utility and the physical health benefit — this one definitely has me.

Photos of me using Blackrapid’s straps by Swedish photographer Jojje Olsson. See his site here.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Friday, December 16th, 2011

Making “Boring” People Interesting


Murong Xuecun is one of the least boring people I have ever met.

He is energetic. He is dynamic. He is impressively clever. And in the last year, he has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics of censorship in China.

However, he is a writer.

And when New York Times’ correspondent Edward Wong first mentioned he was writing an in-depth feature on Murong, I initially doubted an accompanying video component would help add much value to the package. I did some background research and found articles with pictures of the young writer. Nearly every single one showed the author looking at a computer in some form or another, 3 out of 4 being a silhouetted picture of the back of his head with the computer out of focus or him at an internet café.

The still images I saw were far from inspiring. I imagined a video full of talking heads, with sequences of static imagery that would inevitably go on for too long and drive viewers to click away.

But right before I decided it wasn’t worth making the video, I read this speech Murong had recently given. Words started jumping off the page:

This is castrated writing. I am a proactive eunuch, I castrate myself even before the surgeon raises his scalpel. Our language has been cut into two parts: one safe, and the other risky. Some words are revolutionary, and others are reactionary; some words we may use, and others belong to our enemies.

And just like that, I was hooked. This person was clearly an outspoken agent calling for change and reform in his society. All of a sudden Murong turned from a writer into an incendiary subject on a hot topic. I jumped on board and got to thinking — how do I make a person who is visually boring interesting? And my first inspiration came directly from the same speech. Toward the top of his speech, Murong said:

From my many years’ experience in writing and publishing, I could compile a Sensitive Words Glossary, in which you would certainly find the words “system,” “law,” “government,” as well as a large number of other nouns, several verbs, quite a few adjectives, and even a few special numbers. The glossary would also include all names of religions, all names of important people, all countries, including of course China, and also the phrase “Chinese people.”

On the backend of the speech, the author continued:

If there really were a Sensitive Words Glossary, I hope that it could be published; in this way at least we could all save a lot of time, and reduce the possibility of unwittingly committing “word crimes.”

Sitting in a small airport in Burlington, Vermont on my way back to China I thought — maybe I can help him publish this list of sensitive words. I dreamed up a bunch of scenarios of how I could visualize a list of words and eventually came to the conclusion that I should let this man say the words that ordinarily he can’t say.

This train of thought continued to a greater concept on voiceovers vs subtitles. While most international news videos get a voiceover treatment, I started thinking it would be completely ironic to mute the man, when he is in fact, talking about words which he can not use. I decided subtitles were more appropriate which then opened up more doors for cinematic storytelling and made it a little easier to justify adding music to a news piece. Although I was excited to make the piece, I was still a bit worried about keeping it moving and wanted the music to keep the piece from drying up.

Now, regardless of the man’s profession, I had a hot subject and an idea for a snappy intro. I had music to help move the piece in a rhythmic narrative and a logic behind how I would represent his opinions visually.

And while I knew I had to shoot him writing or at the computer, I also knew I wanted to get him out of the context where we are used to seeing writers. When you get stuck shooting a “boring” person (or one, who doesn’t do anything visually exciting) I think this is a great exercise to find a new physical environment. Simply, get them out of the physical environment where they normal are or where we expect to see them. It doesn’t matter where — just someplace else. I wanted to see him interacting with people, and when I found out he was going out to dinner with some journalists and human rights lawyers, I was ecstatic when I got the invite to tag along.

This was the trickiest part of the video — both visually and narratively. How to link the home interviews, the writing visuals and a bunch of guys at dinner. With some thinking, it was easy enough to have narration lead the story into the restaurant, but shooting this was much more tricky.

There’s a Zoom H1 hidden on the table near the bear drinking, cigarette-smoking intellectuals. I have a 60D switching between a Gorilla Pod, a tripod and the in-table lazy susan. In addition, I had a 5DMII on a shoulder rig. And while I didn’t leave a camera rolling the entire time, I did leave the audio rolling. When I got back, I synched all of the audio with the video clips I had, and although I had tons of great dialogue, in the end I just grabbed one meaty quote that allowed me to jump from frame to frame anachronistically. Had I used multiple quotes or too much back and forth dialogue, I would have been forced into using more real time footage. Using just one quote allowed me to use some of my favorite visuals from the entire night.

With the intro set and multiple environments in the bank, I just needed to shoot the interviews. Knowing that I was at risk of having a boring video, I kept two cameras rolling continually during the interviews so when it came time to cut, I could keep all my frames short and bounce between a Canon 50mm f/1.2 and a Canon 24mm f/1.4.

With the credit roll, intro and title sequence, the video came out at 4 minutes and 20 seconds. Keeping voiceover out, adding music, using multiple environments and multiple cameras rolling during interviews, I hope I succeeded in making a visually “boring” person interesting.

And while I can’t answer that question for you, I can say the greater lesson I took away from this project was the potential assets we gain from simply researching what our subjects have to say, have said and what they might want to say.

MORE ON MURONG XUECUN:

• Read Edward Wong’s story “Pushing China’s Limits on Web, if Not on Paper”
• An Excerpt from ‘Leave Me Alone: A Novel of Chengdu’
• More on Murong: Words We Can Use, and Those We Can Not

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Monday, December 5th, 2011

Dissemination and the Art of Entrepreneurial Journalism


NOTE FROM JONAH: The following blog post is a guest lecture I am giving to the International Multimedia Journalism MA in Beijing, Wednesday night. The course is based in Beijing, and is a collaboration between the Beijing Foreign Studies University and the University of Bolton in the UK. The course leader is Dr DJ Clark.

DISCLAIMER 1: Dear Biel Calderon, Stephanie Thiedig, Mark Esplin, Joseph Djima, Dirk Claus, Jeff Kennel, Lui Chen, Tracey Shelton, Michela Orlandi, Yi Song, Lee Ryan Perkins, Chen Mai, DJ Clark, Sharon Lovell and BFSU social media and photography students,

In talking about online promotion for photographers, there is no correct answer. There are certainly best practices, things to avoid and techniques to help, but the information that follows this note is simply my quasi-guerilla (social) warfare technique that I employ to promote me, my photography and my business. The online atmosphere for #togs is constantly changing and in many ways, to stay up to date with the blogosphere, microblogosphere and visual communities — would be a full time job. While we have other full time jobs already, doing every step below, every day, is simply not always possible … but we can sure try.

DISCLAIMER 2: Yes, I am promoting myself, by talking about promotion.


WHY SHOULD WE PROMOTE OURSELVES?

The first question we might ask before we get into how I go about promoting myself, might be — why should we promote ourselves?

We are currently living in an over-saturated photographic world. Nothing says this better than the latest iPhone update. While the phone has improved a small bit, the big push from Apple this round was a photographic update. For $399 mobile phone users now have an 8MP camera and a video camera shooting 1080P at 30 fps. Apple’s attention to this detail (over some more practical things) is certainly a testament to the world’s current obsession with photography.

Meatheads with an iPhone

Given that the average meathead has at least 8 MP in their pocket, and thousand of talented graduates come out of J-school, photography school or multimedia programs like yourselves every year, it becomes increasingly important that we as professionals not only separate ourselves from the general amateur photo community, but also within the professional community.

By promoting ourselves efficiently we gain two things. First and most importantly, we gain eyes on our work. Second and also most importantly, we gain income. While some will disagree, our work is heavily based on technology that is constantly changing and improving. To keep these toys in our hands, we need money. Increasing our revenues to keep up with technology is important (as is money to live comfortably while tackling this competitive world).

While no one will put a knife to your throat saying “promote!!!” there is a great risk in not promoting because everyone else will be doing it. This has a semi-swing effect for photographers who don’t have web sites, have no Google klout or place in online social communities. At least from the public perception and online eye, you could become buried under those who do. For some this is very tough. I have plenty of friends who truly dislike social media and online promotion — but who are great photographers. You can chose not to play the game, but given the online environment for #togs, you are walking a slippery line.


PREPRODUCTION AND ENTREPRENEURIAL JOURNALISM: YOURNAME.COM

When I was going through J-school I was always told — if you are looking for money, you might want to try the business school across campus. Post univisity, in my first years as a staffer at newspapers I was paid the equivalent of peanuts by Swift Communications, a chain of newspapers in America’s west.

While you probably won’t become a millionaire by being a photojournalist, for the entrepreneurial journalist there is a world of financial opportunity out there. To get a piece of this, you need to think about your images, as your business.

Freelancers often think about themselves as independent contractors going from job to job. This is true. However, what you are really doing is creating a business. So whether you sell cupcakes, lemonade or photos — you should have a plan. Brand yourself as your business. Branding is essential to any business.

The first step to this branding, is creating a web site. And the first step in creating a web site is creating a name for your web site. I see a lot of questionable decisions at this early stage of the game.

Do you want to brand your name or some other abstract title? For example, you might have a portfolio site that has lots of breathtaking photos form Asia. You want a web site to show case this work and call it “asiaphoto.com.” Now, let’s say this site becomes popular. The average person will now know asiaphoto.com instead of your name (.com). I see this very often with nascent production companies and individuals who chose a name which makes them look like companies. In the much more likely scenario that the business doesn’t succeed, you’ve also wasted time branding a business that doesn’t exist anymore, while you as a person, photographer and business — will always exist.

My first web site was called kesselimaging.com. This site branded “Kessel Imaging” which was actually just me. After a couple years I decided to pull the plug and stop wasting time promoting an ephemeral brand, and instead brand me (a real person … I think) and moved my branding efforts to jonahkessel.com.

• For more on entrepreneurial journalism check out Steve Buttry’s post “Jonah Kessel and Carmen Sisson discuss entrepreneurship and photojournalism” here.


STEP ONE: YOUR ONLINE BACKBONE

Jonah_Kessel_livebooks_website

The backbone to my online presence is my web site (not to be confused with my blog, photoblog, microblog, etc.). First, in no way does Facebook “cut it” as “your website”. Neither does Flickr, Picasa or some other photo sharing site.

I meet photographers almost daily who don’t have personal Web sites. Many of these folks will have Flickr pages or Facebook pages — but don’t be confused, these become largely invisible to the public eye, expanded social networks and bots who will be your friends in getting visitors, clients and eyes on your work.

While bots are increasingly indexing social media, by hosting your works on these sites, you end up promoting them, sometimes more than yourself. They gain traffic. They gain Google status. And perhaps worst off,they can gain the rights to your media. On an subconscious level or psychological level, hosting your content exclusively on a social media site such as Facebook or Flickr, can create an unprofessional association with your work.

BEST PRACTICES FOR PHOTOGRAPHERS CORE WEB SITES: The top five concerns I have with my site, and also the top four problems I see with other photographers’ sites are: usability, compatibility, search-ability, share-ability and load times. Let’s quickly go through these elements:

  • USABILITY: On a basic level, your web site should be easy to use. In fact, it should be so easy to use — an idiot should be able to navigate. For the busy client who is checking dozens of photographers’ sites, fancy and hidden buttons can turn mean a click off or closed tab.
  • COMPATIBILITY: Your web site should function not only across all browsers but all platforms — and for all users. jonahkessel.com may look like a flash built site, but there’s more than meets the eye backstage. Underneath the flash site is a mirror HTML site for users who don’t have flash as well as for bots who are indexing content. There is also a site for mobile users, a site for tablet users and another site for disabled users.
  • SEARCH-ABILITY: Photographers who simply have one flash built site lose a tremendous amount of traffic because bots can’t truly search the content of the site. Every image on jonahkessel.com has: (1) file names specifically labeled for SEO, keywords specifically labeled for SEO, titles specifically labeled for SEO. While this information is not contained in the flash built site, it is contained in the HTML site. When bots cruise the Web they see this information, index it and then make it available for users and potential clients browsing. Then when they click the link, the images forward to the flash built site. If your content is not searchable or findable, its almost as good as it not being there.
  • SHARE-ABILITY: I’m assuming you are all children of the 21st century and understand the power of sharing. A viral video or a photo can take off putting millions of eyes on your work. Let’s hope that content links back to you — but in the meantime, let’s make sure there is a sharing button accessible ALL OF THE TIME. By not having these buttons easily accessible, or accessible at all, you are simply loosing out to potential traffic, eyes and income.
  • LOAD TIMES: Unlike print journalists, our media unfortunately requires some space. It is critical to keep file sizes on videos and photos down to the smallest point possible. A long load time can be the difference between a click off and view. You could have the best content in the world, but if it takes too long to see it — no one will.

There are about a thousand choices for web sites. For the past three years I have been a client of Livebooks, a company who makes web sites for photographers. For the most part, I’ve been very satisifed. The company has lots of options including custom options. Might site is custom built off of my own functionality and front end visual design.

jonahkessel.com backend

The company allowed me to give them the blueprints of how everything should work and look, and then they build the back end. The back end (in screenshot above) has a graphic user interface that makes managing the web site extremely simply, easy and fast. When I update the GUI, it updates the site and all mirror sites (including mobile and tablet sites). While this isn’t free — I couldn’t imagine updating 6 web sites manually every time I make a small change. The money spent on the site surely is made up in productivity time later.

In my continued efforts to brand myself as a business, the details of the site will also cross into the upcoming topics. Fontography, color schemes, link functionality and logos will be cross-branded across all of my web sites. Although these are small details and are largely ignored, the subconscious effect of branding continued out over multiple platforms turns you as an individual — into a brand.

You can sell a brand. Selling yourself is much more difficult … or illegal (in most places).


Jonah Kessel's Blogs

STEP TWO: YOU HAVE A SITE, NOW WHAT?

After creating jonahkessel.com, my goal was to create a continued traffic stream to it. While there are a number of ways to do this, we can split it up to a couple key categories: the blogosphere, the microblogosphere and social media communities. By engaging in these three keys elements, you will bring direct traffic to your site, while creating a Google ranking that will bring clients to your doorstep.

  • BLOGOSPHERE: The site you are currently viewing is my blog, hosted by Wordpress. This site, named “Nomadically Curious Visual Thoughts” (note visual branding/attention to myname.com over title in logo) is dedicated to long form blogging and details images I take from traveling, as well as commentary about work I do. The general topics are journalism, photography, technology, video, China and travel. In an active month I will update it eighth to ten times. In a inactive month (which probably means I’m too busy to even sleep) I will update it two or three times. Since I am always working or traveling — there is never a shortage of items to blog about.

    The Wordpress community is often a more mature community and technically sound one, than some of its counterparts (i.e. Blogger, Tumblr, etc.). People who use Wordpress generally know HTML (at least enough to update a blog) and in general, the professional blogosphere is found here.

    I also host a photo blog called “Good Light and Good Luck” hosted on Tumblr. The Tumblr environment is very very different to that of the Wordpress community. In general demographics of users seem to be much younger. Narrowcasting seems to be much greater in the Tumblr environment as well. While in the Wordpress arena we see blogs on China or technology for example, on Tumblr, topics are widdled down to a much more specific level. Some of my favorite examples of narrowcasting on Tumblr include Kim Jong-il Looking at Things, Lesbians Who Look Like Justin Beiber, Fuck Yeah Girls on Bikes and Awesome People Hanging out Together.

    I do believe a monkey could use Tumblr. Its extremely simply, extremely efficient and requires no knowledge of HTML. While I target a general audience with my Wordpress, I am targeting a younger demographic with the Tumblr blog. However, my Tumblr account is linked directly to my Twitter account and Facebook account, and these are updated simultaneously to a Tumblr post.

    The photoblog I update (at least) every day. However, this process is automated. About once a month I will update the blog for the next 30 days. I program the system to release one picture a day that includes a large caption with some backstory about the photo. I initially started this blog as a simply traffic fishing device that required little effort; however, over time I have come to like the community and its ability to focus on very narrow subjects.

    My Google Analytic report for last year shows my Wordpress blog as the eighth largest traffic generator toward my mane site, and Tumblr coming in at eleventh.

  • MICROBLOGOSPHERE: While my blogs rank eight and eleventh in traffic generators to my main site, microblogs are ranking much higher, coming in at third, only behind Google and direct traffic. When I talk about microblogging I am primarily talking about Twitter. I believe Twitter is the single greatest tool we have for promoting ourselves as photographers; however, without the assets listed above (site, blogs) it becomes a much different beast.

    Twitter is something that has become integrated not only into my work but my life. It is always on. While I have backed off a bit compared to where I was at about a year ago (in terms of time actually spent watching Twitter feeds), it is still an intrigal part of my life. It connects me people who see and view my work. It gives me the opportunity to let those people who do follow my work, do follow it as it develops.

    From posting cell phone photos during shoots, to talking about the process as it happens from shoot to edit, Twitter helps me create transparency in what I do. People ask me questions daily about photography, technology and the stories I am working on. As a journalist I believe transparency in our work creates exponential value to our content. When readers, viewers or users have a connection to both the content and journalist, this becomes a lot easier.

    Making Twitter an effective tool for promoting is not as simple as just placing a link to your content when it becomes available. In fact, per article you publish you might have a specific roll out plan just for Twitter in how to best promote your work. But first, you need an active community of followers and aggregators to help spread your links around. And this means actually being part of the community, helping to promote other journalists and photographers works and engaging in dialogue.

    If you have 100,000 followers, but you are not active with them — the tool will be much less powerful. However, 200 active followers can be a huge help in getting your work into their networks.

    Here’s a couple things I keep in mind when using Twitter to promote my work:

    • TIME ZONES: Your followers most likely follow many people, and probably exist in many time zones. Therefor, if you post something once at 9:00 am its probably unrealistic to think Sahid in Qatar, Jaques in France and Chen in China all see the link. This makes it necessary to post things for different audiences in different time zones. Now look at times during the day when people might most likely be online.

      Right before lunch, when desk employees are killing time before they can take off. Right after lunch, when people don’t want to do work cause they are tired and full. Maybe 45 minutes after people arrive at work and are finished checking their work emails and thinking about how long till lunch. 30 minutes before the end of the work day is another great time when the Twittesphere becomes very active.

      If you post during those times and based on different time zones, you’re sure to get a little more attention.

      However, if you post the exact same Tweet twice, or Tweet too often, you’re followers will likely be annoyed with you for clogging up streams with content they’ve already seen. There is a fine balance between tweeting often enough, but not too often to be annoying.

      To give your followers more than just your content its important to stagger tweets linking back to your content, with tweets leading elsewhere, or commentary on other people’s works. If I put out a big piece that I thought could really go viral, I would link out to it every four hours for a day, and in between link to other things. With an article that was not as important, I might do it twice in a day (once for the Eastern hemisphere and one for the West – usually separated by 12 hours exactly).

    • TIMED TWEETS: You may be thinking … well, that seems like a lot of work. And it is. However, you don’t need to be sitting next to a computer the entire day waiting for 4:30 to roll around in every time zone. Instead you can use tools to automate Twitter. For example, right now, I am talking to you; however, I have programmed Twitter to automatically send tweets out during this lecture every 10 minute pointed at one of your Web sites.

      Having a presence on Twitter during all time zones will create a bigger following in more places. So take advantage of technology and tweet while you are sleeping.

    • SEO: You only have 140 characters, and Google is watching, so make them count. Just like writing a good headline, writing a good Tweet will make be clip or pass over.
  • SOCIAL COMMUNITIES: Beyond Twitter and the microblogosphere, other online social communities are critical in creating traffic to your sites. Last year, Facebook ranked fourth (only behind direct traffic, Google and Twitter) in generating traffic to jonahkessel.com. In the last six months of this year, Vimeo ranked eight, with stumbleupon, YouTube, Google+ all also ranking in the top 20.

    Social communities can build your profile independently of your web sites as well. Today (November 23, 1:52pm), I had 2,300 views on Vimeo alone. This doesn’t count YouTube, Youku and Toudu where I also host videos.

STEP THREE: BANG FOR YOUR BUCK

So far, we’ve discussed the basics of online promotion. This is the bare minimum. However, if you want to excel I believe with each article or project you produce you can have a promotion plan and weasel your content into more places. Let’s take a couple examples, going from simple to some more complicated methods.

THE TEASER: If movies can have teasers, why can’t you? As cinematic journalism increases you’ll probably see more of this. I’m currently working on a project for Save the Children documenting disabled people around China. On December 1 a series of six videos will release on a new channel on Youku to promote the NGO and the channel. The videos are funded by the European Union as well as Save the Children.

The client requested a teaser to help promote their screening as well as the upcoming online dissemination. This can be a great money maker because, hey, its easy. Most of the content will already be ready to go: edited, color graded, codec-ed, etc.


THE REEL: In the past, it was normally just cinematographers, cameraman and movie people making reels. However, in the realm of cinematic journalism putting images with music can create a great self promotional tool. Having a reel ready, also opens up the doors to working outside of the traditional journalism fields. While I am largely video based now, in the past I would still make an annual reel made up of still images.

Creating a reel can be effective and fun. However, there are many things to think about when creating one. See this post “The Science of the Reel” for more thoughts on journalists using a reel as a promotional tool.


THE GUEST BLOG: Alright, so you have a blog, a photo blog, a microblog — now its time to guest blog. I guest blog on a number of different sites, one of my favorite being DSLR News Shooter. This community is mostly film makers and visual journalists, but plenty of audience members too. The video above, which was made mostly for the fun of it — has received over 5000 views, just on this site. For taking 20 minutes out of my day to write a blog post, I would say this is worth it.

Guest blogging also opens up the door for community members of that blog, to find your blog, increasing your core audience. On all major articles I produce I try to write at least one guest blog talking about what went into the production or some type of backstory, on top of creating content for my own blog. Here’s a couple examples:

Video above, guest blog post here:CHINESE NEW YEAR GOES WITH A BANG FOR SHOOTERS JONAH KESSEL AND PAUL MORRIS WITH CANON DSLRS


PRODUCT REVIEWS: Reviewing products can benefit more than just a manufacturer. When reviewing gear, you can use your own work as an example of what can be done with the kit. By speaking out on your experience with gear and kit, you can help create dialogue for both users of technology and the creators.

In this example, I combine a product review of Kessler Crane’s Pocket Dolly, with a promotion for my own work. Guest blog post here: KESSEL ON KESSLERCRANE – JONAH KESSEL REVIEWS THE KESSLERCRANE POCKETDOLLY V2.0


PEOPLE HAVE QUESTIONS, YOU HAVE ANSWERS: People are curious. That’s a universal truth. One of my favorite new sites (which admittedly I had more time to use) is called Quora. Its a social media based Q&A site with an excellent community of experts on various subjects. As journalists we’re always (at least attempting to) answering questions. Often when I have a new story I think about what question it might be answering. For more on Quora and its potential see this post “Curious on Quora.”

In the example above, I created a video on censorship. I searched Quota for questions relating to censorship and China and found a couple that it related to. For example, one user had asked “When will China’s web censorship stop and the government’s attitude change?” While my video didn’t exactly answer this question, I did have an unused quote that I added to the conversation. I then gave some links to help push viewers from this site to my content in other places.


UTILIZING YOUR ASSETS: Often I see great content with short legs. This means, I see a great article but I don’t think the journalist (if its a freelancer) necessarily got all they could out of it. If you can promote your content efficiently, you will have the capability to make more money while getting more eyes on your content.

This means one project can have many different lives. In the fall of 2011, journalist Kit Gillet and myself created a project called “The Fate of Old Beijing.” This was an interactive project funded by the Asia Society and included three videos, a digital tour and two photo essays. You can see the project in that form here. However, we wanted more eyes on the content.

While we had an audience in the nonprofit sector, we then found a home for the video package in the editorial, or news sector. We sold the package to Global Post, who published all three videos in a series called Beijing’s vanishing act. You can see those videos here.

After a nonprofit and online newspaper — we moved to television and sold the rights to the Archeology Channel, where the videos were shown in the summer of 2011. Their posting about the series here.

Using our own contacts in the media, we started offering interviews and screenings of the films. This might seem like an obvious thing to do, but you will gain a greater audience by simply making yourself available to other journalists. Here’s some links of some of the places I interviewed, blogged or helped promote my material:

Beyond online media, we had enough content on this one to flip it around into a print article. As DSLR shooters, you always have the option to shoot stills and video. I often grab a still shot before I shoot video, to examen the frame. This gives me still photographs of most subjects and places I go. When video is rolling, you are grabbing quotes. So the only thing left is to fill in the details of the story where the quotes leave off.

The Fate of Old Beijing - print

This video appeared as a print article in UK based Geographical magazine in November of 2011, nearly six months after its first publication at the Asia Society, again — bringing in more revenue while getting more eyes on our content.

THE WIDE WIDE WORLD: You may have noticed a great variety of places mentioned above. Geographic variation can be another great asset to your content. When I publish an article, often times I think — “Ok, its published in China. Where’s next?” While publications like the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal won’t make this possible, other publications have looser rules surrounding the issue.

HONG KONG: SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Hong Kong - Underground Beijing

In many instances this can be a great asset to you and publications. For example, it is unlikely a reader in India will read a newspaper in Hong Kong. Above, you can see an article titled “Tunnel Vision” which appear in South China Morning Post in May.

BEIJING: THAT’S BEIJING
Beijing - Underground City

Three months later, a slighter shorter version appeared in That’s Beijing’s August edition. The article would again be printed in Caravan, an Indian magazine. And of course, a blog post. Looking at your content as dynamic assets will get more eyes on your content while at the same time raising your profile and your income.

RE-EDIT/RE-SELL: Keeping control of the rights to your content is perhaps the most important thing you can do in repackaging and reselling. While NGO’s and the nonprofit sector don’t necessarily pay well, its usually pretty easy to control the rights to your content while helping out a good cause. Most NGOs are very happy in this scenario as it creates greater awareness of their cause. Here’s an example:

I support a couple different NGO’s, one being Shanghai Roots & Shoots. In the fall of 2011 I helped create a series of twelve, two-minute videos detailing one of their projects called “The Million Tree Project.”

The NGO paid for my expenses to travel to Inner Mongolia and film their volunteers planting trees in the desert. While there I grabbed more content that I knew would not be needed for their films, but might be useful for an additional program. In the end, I had enough content to create their videos as well as another long form piece here:

I find the nonprofit and NGO sector to be a great resource in doing ethical work while gaining assets that would otherwise be expensive and hard to find. In my experience, its pretty rare to encounter newspapers and magazines that will pay freelancers expenses (lodging, flights, food, fixers, translators). However, NGOs can do this — and as long as you can keep yourself separated as a journalist from their agenda, you can put yourself in a great position to gather unique and sellable content.


FINDING THE TIME

If the above plan sounds daunting, it is. On good days, I can get it all done. On days where hundred of emails are stacking up and the clock clicks away toward deadline, this can become tough. However, I have found the effect of my dissemination and promotional plan to be invaluable to both my career and content.

Now … Any questions? Those of you in class, ask away, those of you not in Beijing, feel free to write in questions in the comment section below or email me.


  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011

Comrade Wong Buys a Cap


In the summer of 2011, New York Times reporter Edward Wong bought a cap in the North Korean special economic zone of Rason. A month later this cap ended up in my office. Today, that cap is on The New York Times’ home page.

So what is significant about this cap?

While I don’t believe the video (or hat) are anything groundbreaking, from a visual journalist’s point of view there’s a little bit more to it than what you might first see.

First, let me clarify: this video was shot in North Korea by Ed Wong. When it appeared on my plate, I was asked to edit Ed’s video for the New York Times.

I edit (almost) all of my own work. However, relatively rarely do I take on an editing job that I didn’t shoot. This footage, out of North Korea was of enough interest to get me out of bed. However, what I thought would be a fairly easy exercise actually turned into a good learning lesson.

Ed, known in the Twittersphere as @comradewong, is a reporter — not a visual journalist. After sorting through all of Ed’s footage I had a big think of how I could make his hand held footage shot with a consumer video camera, tell the best story possible, to supplement his written story, while also offering another view of the area. Often in this situation, I go look at what other people have done first. Looking at wire stories to find the basic model and then looking further to what other people have done.

Our initial plan was to mix Ed’s footage with AP, Reuters and AFP footage to create a basic news report on North Korea’s nascent capitalism. But after looking at what had been done — it didn’t seem very possible to make something different than what had already been done. After talking to Ed about his experience, we decided that his experience might actually be more interesting to the average viewer than the actual news item, given the context of what media on the subject already existed.

Reporter’s Notebook

This form of journalism is often referred to as a reporter’s notebook: a personal account of reporting on a subject. Telling the story, through the eyes of the reporter, rather than the pen. The audience receives the news item (in this case, DPRK trying out capatalism) but with a literal more human emotion in it to add flavor. Normally, you see broll of the story with a voice over from the reporter explaining the story. However, I wanted to take it a step further and actually added Ed into the film.

I did this in attempt to create a visual dichotomy between Ed’s footage of North Korea and my in-studio footage, making two unique visual environments that are about as opposite as you can get. One in the studio, shot with HDDSLR and the other in the secretive, authoritarian state with a shaky consumer grade camera. I thought this would emphasize the unique environment the reporter found himself in. To highlight the intrinsic, yet subtle weirdness of the area.

A landscape with no commerce, a road with very few cars on it or a scary children’s performance — I hoped these would all seem more weird after the visual comparison of the dry, calm and normal studio interview with Ed.

Direct to Camera?

One question came up whether Ed should be talking direct to camera or not. There are two cameras rolling (a Canon 5DMII and a Canon 7D) in the studio, lit with two softboxes and a red fill on the black backdrop. In a basic news report, the reporter would be talking direct to camera. In a documentary, the subject would be speaking off camera — to the unseen documentarian.

In a small way, I felt like we were making a mini-documentary about Ed’s experience in North Korea. Ergo, he would be talking to the documentarian (me) off camera. I’ve received some feedback that people think this is strange and he should be talking direct to camera. I still haven’t made up my mind which would be more interesting and what the appropriate thing to do is; however, I do feel like we have expended on the traditional, reporter’s notebook model by removing the viewer one step back to where the post production is actually being done. An additional environment — physically and mentally.

The Cap

About four minutes into the video, Ed puts a stereotypical communist cap on.

Ed had the idea of showing the audience a cap he had purchased in a store that would not allow him to film or even bring a notebook in. When I thought about the idea I was initially against it because I thought it would just simply be cheezy. However, its always good to let an idea play out and see what happens before quashing it. So I filmed it and looked at the result. While I had a bit of anxiety about the idea, in the end I actually thought the result added something significant to the piece.

The result is definitely weird and (I hope) definitely a bit out of left field. Something that viewers aren’t expecting. We change camera angles as Ed puts the cap on (direct-to-camera), and we hold the frame for a couple awkward seconds in dead silence. I hope these couple of seconds denote the reporter’s sense of humor in this situation; however, I’m not sure if people will get the tongue and cheek bit or simply watch it and say — “that was stupid.”

I do hope it will make people grin a bit and help transport some of the oddity of North Korea and into people’s homes.

Fin

In the end we hopefully have created something a little more out of the ordinary, that may have otherwise been dry. We expanded a bit on the reporter’s notebook model, added a bit of humor into the piece while hopefully still giving the audience the information from the actual news item.

To read Edward Wong’s print article “Tending a Small Patch of Capitalism in North Korea” click here.

To see our video “North Korea Opens for Business” on the New York Time’s web site click here.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Friday, October 14th, 2011

Cinematic News – At the Desert’s Edge


NOTE FROM JONAH: This is a response from a comment from a guest blog I wrote for DSLR News Shooter. See the original post here.

After finishing a couple projects for the New York Times and some shorter video pieces, I had the opportunity to do some long form video journalism for the Asia Society, once again on the topic of desertification (this now being the 14th video I’ve made on the subject).

The threat of desertification is an issue of global concern. In China, expanding deserts are taking a heavy toll on the lives and livelihoods of citizens all across the world’s most populous country. China lost approximately 660,000 squares miles of land to deserts between 2005 and 2009 alone.

While there is not one single solution to combating desertification, Kulun Qi, a dry area in northeastern Inner Mongolia, has shown signs of hope that may eventually work as an example to others adversely affected by encroaching deserts around the world.

At the Desert’s Edge documents the trials and tentative successes of a collaborative effort between locals, governmental initiatives and NGOs fighting to combat China’s growing deserts by planting vast barriers of trees.

Cinematic Journalism and the Resell

If you follow this blog, you’ll notice this footage is a re-edit and combination of twelve short videos Kit Gillet and myself made for Shanghai Roots & Shoots and Dragon TV on the Million Tree Project. I think its a good example of how to use your assets as a freelancer.

We had characters and interviews that never made the 12 previous videos, and enough content to make a completely different video with its own monetary and intrinsic value. Clients frequently ask, and sometimes demand “exclusivity.” When I say, this cost a lot more they don’t understand and are sometimes largely put off by it. However, as freelancers, our images are our assets and repackaging and reselling content can make a real difference in our incomes.

While the other videos were “short and sweet” – this one is on the long side. The request came in for a 10-minute video which was at first was a bit intimidating.

However, when you start piecing together a video, 10 minutes does go pretty quick. However, for Web purposes I believe it is on the long side. The challenge here is creating something that isn’t boring, not rushed and can hold a viewers interest for 10 minutes without them clicking on another page. Admittedly, this might be impossible.

Do people watch 10-minute videos online?

When it comes to Hulu or other online movie sites the answer is, yes. However, with news videos I believe the 10-minute mark is pretty steep.

In a recent review of Kessler Crane’s Pocket Dolly on DSLR Newsshooter, photographer Chris Gibbs commented on the film:

If I have one comment it would be about the use of these sliders. I just don’t appreciate the effect in journalism. Furthermore, over the web, the effect rarely plays back satisfactory. Just an observation from a viewers perspective!

While Chris is directly referring to the slider, I think he may be refering to cinematic news in general. Is it ok to use a jib for a news report? If I decide to setup a dolly, am I changing what’s actually happening? Are you tricking the audience? Is it less truthful? I think these are all valid questions and I can sympathize with the old-school photojournalism view here. However, the fact that people don’t follow the news and do follow movies is a good symbol to me that we need to make (as Dan Chung so elegantly says) “real life look as good as cinema,” if we are going to keep a modern audience involved with current events.

Nothing in my films is ever “setup” to the extent I tell people what to do. However, I might setup my gear with anticipation of something happening. The more you film and shoot the more predictable shots become and the better you can get at creating a cinema style news report.

Nonetheless, I think its important to think about Chris’ point in order to keep ourselves in check. Cinematic news is a fine balance between recording events with precision, without changing them and making things exciting to watch. When the photographer starts changing reality, thats when we’ve gone too far.

On the other side, if we make news videos which audience members don’t watch — then we have achieved nothing at all, except for wasting our time and someone else’s money. When the assignment came in to make a 10-minute video, it was obvious to me I had to make the video a little more cinematic than the traditional “man in front of camera” talking video, simply in order to get people to continue to watch without clicking off.

Chris has some beautiful images from Alaska and beyond. Check out his site here.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Thursday, September 29th, 2011

Just Because: Tricycle Calligraphy 水书法器

As a video journalist I’m frequently approached by people asking me to come film — whatever it is they have that’s going on. A Chinese rock band, a new brand or some really exciting business conference are the usual suspects. These people often think their event would be so fun to film, that I would love to do it — for free.

Sadly these people are mistaken, and generally speaking whatever guest speaker is at the “Annual Chinese Conference of Bilateral Business” is not actually that interesting.

However, last week while at a small bar in Beijing a Québécoise approached me and told me he had built a device out of a tricycle that could paint Chinese characters on the ground with water droplets as it was peddled. I stopped for a second and thought about it and my first question was — why?

And his answer was … “because!”

Meet French Canadian Media Artist Nicholas Hanna. This guy decided to build a device for no reason, that doesn’t really serve a clear purpose. So, I decided, this would also be a good time to create a video just “because.”

I wanted to keep it short, sweet and corky. An afternoon filming, a weird soundtrack with an upright bass and a didgeridoo and some editing and we had this fun device on film.

Jonah Kessel Filming on a tricycle

Ironically, I found the best way to film this strange contraption — was on another tricycle, peddled by the days assistant Annie Sallaberry. Now picture both of these tricycles peddling through the old streets of Beijing and you can imagine we were quite the spectacle. As we filmed, people would actually just start following us down the street as if we were the Pied Piper of Chinese people.

As working visual journalists I think its a really great exercise do go out and shoot stuff for fun. Its really easy to get in the habit of only shooting when working. But this two day project was a lot of fun and helped me get back to my roots a bit. It reminded me why we do this in the first place — because its fun.

So — for no reason at all, enjoy.

Kit List for this Project:

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Monday, September 26th, 2011

Filming a Filmmaker: My Perspective on Zhao Liang


NOTE FROM JONAH: This post was originally written for Dan Chung’s DSLR News shooter blog.

On a recent assignment for the New York Times I was tasked with filming a filmmaker.

I’d taken portraits of photographers before, but I had never filmed a filmmaker. Its hard not to have a little bit of anxiety when you know the person you are filming not only knows what you are doing, but has their own opinion on how to do it.

The idea was to create a behind-the-scenes video that describes how Chinese filmmaker Zhao Liang makes his films.

The first step was getting my hands on his films, which wasn’t the easiest thing, given his films are not available in China. Your first question might be — why aren’t Zhao’s films available in China? If you get your hands on one of them the reasons for their unavailability will become pretty clear. For the most part, the content of Zhao’s films is not exactly the type of material the Chinese government wants you to see.

I have discussed previously that I am not necessarily a documentarian, but as a visual journalist working with cinematic storytelling the two fields are certainly not too far off. Regardless of how you work with video, I believe Zhao’s films can teach us all something.

On my first screenings, I though Zhao’s films didn’t necessarily have “beautiful photography”. Even from the samples of the films I used for my video, you can tell most of his films are not multi-million dollar productions or maybe not even multi-thousand dollar productions. These are truly grassroots-style productions that often use gorilla-style photographic techniques.

While the photography isn’t necessarily beautiful, it is in fact extremely powerful, which in itself, I would consider beautiful.

As an image maker, I spend so much of my time trying to compose beautiful images that I had to spend some time thinking about why I felt these images were so powerful. I think the answer comes in the relationship between your content and your images.

Zhao’s films show a truthful view of China, rarely seen. The raw video footage makes the truths and injustices he reveals even more real. Let’s say that Zhao was about to use jibs, dollies or even regular tripod use while filming — the visuals would feel way more contrived. There is some tripod use, but a large majority of this footage is handheld and there’s quite a bit of shakiness to it.

These things are a bit counter-intuitive to a lot of us who spend half our day thinking about gear; however, the effect is one that should be applauded. Not only does Zhao let the footage speak for itself in a digital age, the raw nature of the images actually reaffirm the stories he is telling.

I would describe Zhao’s films as having a “slower pace.” He’s not in a rush to tell his stories. You can tell this — even by the mere fact he spent 12 years filming his movie “Petition.” However, I believe the slow pace matches that of his characters’ realities. This pace creates the opportunity for the audience to actually experience the reality of his subjects.

To visualize this Zhao has left in some less-than-exciting images and scenes. However, these images are real. There are seemingly very few contrived scenes which many other filmmakers set up to help tell their story.

Videos with an interesting story, but that have boring or disconnected images are clearly not good. Videos with amazing imagery, but broken storylines are also not good. In video journalism and documentary film making, the relationship between our images and stories is what separates great productions from the pack. Whether this means holding back on production level like Zhao has or going the opposite direction — when our images and stories work together, our videos become infinitely more powerful.

And in a world where gear means so much its refreshing to see Zhao showing us that you don’t need a million dollars to make a film with a million dollar impact.

The New York Times, Ai Weiwei and Zhao Liang

While my portion of this project was a “behing the scenes” look of Zhao Liang’s productions, New York Times reporter Ed Wong’s lengthy profile shows a much different side of making films in China. Wong reveals how many believe Zhao has now “switched sides” in order to continue to make films in China. While Zhao is still very respected, his cooperation with the Chinese government on his recent film Together as well as a decision to pull out his film Petition from the Melbourne film festival has cost him friends, including the controversial artist Ai Weiwei, who only recently was released from prison.

The Times included a video from Ai Weiwei along with mine as part of the Ed’s story as well as photography by Beijing based photographers Chi Yinsim and Shiho Fukada.

For journalists, cinephiles, videographers, photographers and documentarians — the piece is very interesting and I encourage all to check it out.

– To read New York Times reporter Ed Wong’s story on Chinese filmmaker Zhao Liang click here.
– To find Zhao Liang’s movie check out dGenerate films web site here.
– To read a follow up to Ed’s story, check out New Yorker writer Richard Brody story “CHINA’S CULTURAL EVOLUTION” here.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Wednesday, August 17th, 2011

Kessel on Kessler Crane


NOTE FROM JONAH: This post was originally written for Dan Chung’s DSLR News shooter blog.


Frequently I’ve been doing more and more solo shoots.

No assistants or colleagues to help setup shoots, sound, light or mitigate the weight of my kit. The problem is, creating cinematic journalism requires some kit. So for me – when it comes to solo video production, its all about “bang for your buck.” Or in DSLR terms, how to create the greatest visual impact, with the smallest amount of kit.

For news videos I want to mix some type of mechanical movement, with natural movement, with stationary shots. This means I need a tripod, a shoulder rig and one more device for mechanical movement. After a recent assignment, someone in an email wrote to me:

“Really nice shooting on the piece. Did you lay down track for those slow dolly shots, use a jib, or use some new toy I don’t know about?”

And thus lies my answer to achieving mechanical movement for the solo shooter — the Kessler Pocket Dolly v2.0, Traveller size. What people are doing with this product is truly amazing. There are countless examples of beautiful work with this dolly; however, on a run-and-gun shoot that doesn’t allow much possibility for planning, this tool is excellent. In a matter of 30 seconds you can be setup and ready to shoot in any environment.

Here’s Kessler’s Pocket Dolly v2.0 Traveler Size a week earlier during a shoot in the deserts of Inner Mongolia. This product is simply amazing. The length of this slider (26.5″) fits perfectly on the side of my F-Stop Gear Satori bag (or inside of the bag if you need to).

The slider itself weights 5 lbs. and balances quite nicely with a Manfrotto 190Cx Carbon Fibre Q90 4-section Tripod (weighing in at 3 lbs.) – which is the smallest/lightest tripod I can find that will support the weight of the Kessler’s slider and a Canon 5D Mark II with a Canon 70-200 f/2.8 lens on it.

Kessler Pocket Dolly, Manfrotto Tripod, and F-Stop Satori Bag

When you have the slider and tripod on the side of the bag the weight balances out well and you can continue to shoot stills if you need. Here I am a couple months ago shooting stills in India with both tools on the side my F-Stop bag. So … its portable, useful — and guess what, you can even break it.

Ok, so you don’t want to ever break a piece of gear, but in case you do, this might be the product to break – because it was designed for people like me who might shoot in some less than controlled environments.

I just finished a film for the Asia Society called At the Desert’s Edge. The short film documents the trials and tentative successes of a collaborative effort between locals, governmental initiatives and NGOs fighting to combat China’s growing deserts by planting vast barriers of trees.

However, while shooting and traveling my slider got a couple nicks in the rails. Shooting in sand storms, traveling in less than comfortable conditions and constantly moving — things like this are bound to happen.

Nick in Kessler Crane Pocket Dolly

Although these nicks don’t look so bad they will effect your shots. The above photograph is taken with a Canon MP-E 65mm 1-5x Macro Lens at about 4x — so this nick is almost invisible to the naked eye. But Kessler’s dolly was made with insertable rails which in a recent email they told me, is: “one of the reasons we went to the insert, so dings like this could be repaired.”

Kessler’s labor costs are very reasonable, and for about $35 dollars my slider is being repaired. Other sliders I’ve seen would need to be completely replaced in the case of a dent or nick.

By no means – are Kessler’s products “breakable” or even easy to break. However, the reality of video journalism is that that you can’t control your environment, the people around you — or how airport security handles your kit. So beyond the beautiful movement you can achieve with the slider, the versatility in build is a huge bonus.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Wednesday, August 10th, 2011

What Does Good Mean to You?


NOTE FROM JONAH: This is a guest blog post written for A Good Week based on the question: “What Does Good Mean to You?” A Good Week: is a global celebration of all the Good that happens in the world. We will shine a spotlight on the people, communities and businesses who do Good.

I was honored to be asked by A Good Week to answer this question. Funny enough, although the question is simple, the answer is not. I encourage everyone to check out this Web site and the people they are interviewing around the world. Myriad topics span across the globe documenting what people are doing to make earth a better place. From Sir Richard Branson to students in Palestine, to a retired teacher back at it in the Himalaya, to thoughts on ethical consumerism — there is a wealth of good thoughts on the site.

Here are mine …

Inspiring Good through visual storytelling
July 28, 2011 4:40 pm

Jonah M. Kessel is a Beijing-based freelance photographer, videographer, print and web designer. Jonah’s own desire to do Good leads him to create and document stories that inspire people to take action themselves, in a way that shows that rest of the world that individuals can make a difference to the global community. Here, he talks to A Good Week about what Good means to him and in more detail about what he hopes to achieve through his work.

Earlier this year UN Ambassador of Peace Jane Goodall said to me: “If you really want something, and you work hard, and you take advantage of opportunity, and you never give up — you will find a way.” When you look at the problems facing our world, it can be quite intimidating. But Goodall’s message gives me hope that individuals can and do make a difference.

And while I can’t claim to define what “good” is, I can describe what “good” means to me.

The tricky part of this question is to examine the relationship between “good” and “better”. There is a certain amount of subjectivity here; however, I believe to do “good” is to make things “better”, to improve things. This means, not just understanding the problems and issues we face as a global community, but fundamentally understanding that we are all part of one global community. We are all connected — regardless of where we are or what we do.

I believe there is also a strong relationship between “awareness” and “good.” Issues which people are not aware of, have very little chance of getting better.

As a visual journalist and storyteller, when I have the chance to document something that I believe people should be aware of, I try to jump on the opportunity in the hope that any subsequent action will be enough to make people think and, if I’m very lucky, encourage people to take action. As an individual this is how I try to do good — by creating awareness, which I hope in turn will cause a wider audience to think about our world and the issues that exist within it.

Through my job I see individuals frequently doing good things. Last month, I created 12 videos documenting volunteers of Shanghai Roots & Shoots on a reforestation trip to the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China. While the volunteers are combating desertification by planting trees, they are also sending a message to people around the world that individuals can take action — and make things better, both on a local and on a global level.

In other instances, videos I take don’t show people taking action, but highlight problems that need attention. I recently finished a project documenting the redevelopment of a culturally rich area in Beijing. Some organizations are fighting for the area and the residents who live there; however, without greater awareness the area and its historic and cultural legacy may become lost amid China’s rapid modernization.

I think the direction that young people on this earth are going in is very encouraging. We have problems, but there are people who are actively trying to make things better, create awareness and who ultimately — do good.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Saturday, July 30th, 2011

On A Red Assignment with the New York Times


NOTE FROM JONAH: This post was originally written for Dan Chung’s DSLR News shooter blog.


While all around China, journalists were reporting on the July 1, 90th anniversary of the Communist Party of China and dozens of red revival stories are popping up — to celebrate this anniversary I went someplace where there was no need for a red revival. This place had been red for a long time.

It was nighttime when I found my Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM pointed up at a 10 meter high portrait of Stalin in the middle of Central China. I was filming in a village called Nanjie — China’s last Maoist collective.

While contemplating Stalin’s role in history the words of the village’s Party Secretary echoed in my head. “Nobody is perfect, even saints make mistakes.”

I was filming in a place where Stalin is considered a saint. Next to Stalin’s portrait were equally over-sized portraits of Marx, Engels and Lenin … all of which were trumped in size by a 20 meter tall statue of Mao Zedong.

Over the past three decades while China has been moving toward a market economy, this place had stayed frozen in time. All of the land and the commercial enterprise are owned by the collective.

Residents get free housing and apartments, education, health care — even food. This place was actually what I thought a communist society was supposed to be like, just about the opposite of what I see at home in Beijing. It was as though I were transported 60 years back in time — but given a Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 60D and Panasonic Lumix DMC-zs10, a Pelican case full of glass and a Kessler Crane Pocket Dolly v2.0 to take with me.

This was one of the stranger assignments I have been on in China. As if everyone in the town had eaten some communist version of ecstasy, to say the least, it was hard to get anything negative out of anyone in this town.

This was a classic example of going someplace end being escorted around by the village’s PR, as if the town was a museum. While being escorted around in golf carts, a young pretty girl with a headset would tell us about the town pointing out landmarks and notable buildings. While everyone was seemingly happy as could be, I was initially skeptical I was just being shown the “good” side of things. However, after we dipped out from the PR and seemingly lost our follow, I began to talk to lots of random people — seemingly uncensored. I came out thinking these people were truly happy. Although only four subjects made it into the short news clip, I interview about twelve people.

However, there was something a bit dodgy about this village of only 3000 people. The 3000 people — have 7000 migrant Chinese working for them. On top of this, the town had massive bank loans.

What appeared to be a simple video, was now something a little more tricky. It had to be a revealing piece — showing that one layer below the peacefulness of the commune, lay some confusing philosophies.

At some point, New York Times reporter Ed Wong asked the Party Secretary if he lived in the same housing unit that everyone else did.

“I have a house,” the secretary said. “How many villagers live in an actual home,” asked Ed.

“Just me,” he said, and smiled.

Orwellian notions filled my head: “All are equal. But some are more equal than others.”

While there was clearly some strange communist ideology going on, no one in the town thought this was strange or bad. Even the migrant workers seemed to be happy — making more money then they might in other parts of China, although they still didn’t get benefits from the collective.

Coming off some longer video pieces, I was trying to keep this under four minutes, so to reveal this was tricky.

While the town seemed to be stuck in time, I pulled back the saturation on all the footage to give it a little bit more of a historical and film feel.

On my way back to Beijing, I tried to recap the seemingly North Korean-esque village I had just shot. I wondered if my footage would accurately represent the place. Happy, yet dodgy. Socialist, but elitist. In the end, we got the video to a pretty compact nature. Quick, quirky and hopefully insightful and entertaining at the same time.

– To read New York Times reporter Ed Wong’s story “In China, a Place Where Maoism Still Reigns” click here.

Jonah M. Kessel is a Beijing-based freelance visual journalist working with photography, video, print and web design. Follow Jonah on Twitter here and see his web site here.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read more.. Sunday, July 24th, 2011